Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201110112052.p9BKq0T02229@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > Standard conforming strings > > was tricky because it was more user-facing, or certainly SQL-facing. > > Why is SQL more important than backup? Because the percentage of database users it affects is different. Administrators know when they are installing a new version of Postgres and already are probably changing these configuration files. Application binaries and perhaps application developers are not as aware of a change, and there are a far higher percentage of them in an organization than administrators. > There is no good reason to do this so quickly. I just gave you a reason above, and as I said, doing backward compatibility can make the system more complex. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: