Re: Dumping roles improvements?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dumping roles improvements? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201110111947.p9BJlBx00694@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dumping roles improvements? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dumping roles improvements?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > > > What is the logic for not dumping passwords but the CREATE ROLE > > statement? I don't see how anyone would recognize that behavior as > > logical. If you want to add a --no-passwords option to pg_dumpall, that > > seems more logical to me. > > That's what I'm suggesting. > > Incidentally, what's the difference between -g and -r in terms of actual > output, anyway? Acording the docs, I assume -r is only roles, while -g includes tablespace, so what you want is already available in pg_dumpall. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: