Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 18:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Agreed.  You could argue that pg_ctl 9.1 is much better than anything
> > anyone would be able to craft in a script.
> 
> And what facts support that argument?

Because pg_ctl 9.1 will read postmaster.pid and find the port number,
socket location, and listen host for wait mode --- I doubt someone would
do that work in a script.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +