Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Дата
Msg-id 201110041342.p94DggW18820@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories  ("Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@gentoo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On m?n, 2011-10-03 at 18:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Agreed.  You could argue that pg_ctl 9.1 is much better than anything
> > anyone would be able to craft in a script.
> 
> And what facts support that argument?

Because pg_ctl 9.1 will read postmaster.pid and find the port number,
socket location, and listen host for wait mode --- I doubt someone would
do that work in a script.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories