Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110930.112443.111535170.horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, I understand that it has been at least practically no problem. Ok, I send this patch to comitters. Thanks for your dealing with nuisance questions. At Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:21:32 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote in <CAHGQGwG0C21F0CZY5ExX-49dxdx7hJuNeiBBJ0Tzvh+7vMXWgw@mail.gmail.com> > >> > Nevertheless this is ok for all OSs, I don't know whether > >> > initializing TimestampTz(double, int64 is ok) field with 8 bytes ... > I believe it's safe. Such a code is placed elsewhere in the source, too. > If it's unsafe, we should have received lots of bug reports related > to that. But we've not. Regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: