Re: fstat vs. lseek
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fstat vs. lseek |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201109161530.30603.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fstat vs. lseek (Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 16 Sep 2011 15:19:07 Andrea Suisani wrote: > hi > > On 08/08/2011 07:50 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> If its ok I will write a mail to lkml referencing this thread and your > >> numbers inline (with attribution obviously). > > > > That would be great. Please go ahead. > > I've just stumbled across this thread on lkml [1] > "Improve lseek scalability v3". > > and I thought to ping pgsql hackers list > just in case, more to the point they're > asking "are there any real workloads which care > [Make generic lseek lockless safe]" I wrote them a mail sometime ago (some weeks) regarding an earlier version of the patch... Can't find it right now though. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: