Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110906151253.GA1209@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters --- > do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this > case there no longer is a PGconn object. > > We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure > it's really worth the trouble. well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble. If I had datbaase standing at 5432, it would connect to it, and then I could mistakenly ran commands to wrong database. this is clearly not a good thing. depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: