Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
От | ktm@rice.edu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110902190545.GW19360@staff-mud-56-27.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:54:07PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2011-08-31 at 13:12 -0500, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > > Hmm, this thread seems to have petered out without a conclusion. Just > > wanted to comment that there _are_ non-password storage uses for these > > digests: I use them in a context of storing large files in a bytea > > column, as a means to doing data deduplication, and avoiding pushing > > files from clients to server and back. > > But I suppose you don't need the hash function in the database system > for that. > It is very useful to have the same hash function used internally by PostgreSQL exposed externally. I know you can get the code and add an equivalent one of your own... Regards, Ken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: