Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201106231222.p5NCMQu15149@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in
the release notes
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > \Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of jue jun 16 18:24:16 -0400 2011: > > > > > I should back up and explain that the reason for having usernames on > > > release feature items is not to give credit, but rather to assign blame > > > later, in case the features cause problems. > > > > I call BS on this. This PoV is perfect for justifying that sponsoring > > companies do not need to get credited, but it's not really the truth. > > Credit *is* given by having people listed in the release notes, whether > > you explicitly admit it or not. And pissing off contributors by taking > > it away is not something to be done lightly. > > I can tell you why _I_ added names to release note items starting 15 > years ago. By putting names on the release note items, if a bug was > found in a release, I could easily know which developer to contact to > get it fixed. I could have trolled the CVS logs, but it is often > complex to find the right item. And why not put the developer names in > the release notes? Who was going to read it except other developers? > > Well, a lot has changed in 15 years, and this name thing is only now > being revisited, which is fine. I find it a happy coincidence that the > names I used to help me are now seen as motivating Postgres > contributions. > > Just a reality check, but I don't think the names in the release notes > were originally seen as motivating developers because the assumption was > that only a handful of people even cared about our release notes. > > > (If assigning blame and being point of contact is really the truth, why > > is there no email address?) > > I already had everyone's email address and it was inefficient to type it > on every item. I could easily look up their email addresses in my mail > program. If you want proof, we only started using full names, e.g. not "(Tom)", in 9.0. It didn't matter if users knew who Tom was --- we did. Look at the 6.1 release notes --- they are mostly only first names. Second, if you want to get rid of the names, we can still place them in SGML comments so developers can see who did a feature. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: