Re: POSIX question
От | Radosław Smogura |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POSIX question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201106201639.02157.rsmogura@softperience.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POSIX question (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: POSIX question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> Monday 20 of June 2011 16:16:58 > On Jun20, 2011, at 15:27 , Radosław Smogura wrote: > > 1. mmap some large amount of anonymous virtual memory (this will be > > maximum size of shared memory). ... > > Point 1. will no eat memory, as memory allocation is delayed and in 64bit > > platforms you may reserve quite huge chunk of this, and in future it may > > be possible using mmap / munmap to concat chunks / defrag it etc. > > I think this breaks with strict overcommit settings (i.e. > vm.overcommit_memory = 2 on linux). To fix that, you'd need a way to tell > the kernel (or glibc) to simply reserve a chunk of virtual address space > for further user. Not sure if there's a API for that... > > best regards, > Florian Pflug This may be achived by many other things, like mmap /dev/null. Regards, Radek
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: