Re: pg_trgm: unicode string not working
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_trgm: unicode string not working |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201106140211.p5E2BGc29320@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_trgm: unicode string not working (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote: > >> > Note that this restriction was removed in postgres 9.1 which > >> > is currently in beta. However, GIT indices must be re-created > >> > with REINDEX after upgrading from 9.0 to leverage that > >> > improvement. > >> > >> Does pg_upgrade know about this? > > > > No, it does not. ?Under what circumstances should I issue a suggestion > > to reindex, and what should the text be? > > It sounds like GIN indexes need to be reindexed after upgrading from < > 9.1 to >= 9.1. I already have some GIN tests I used for 8.3 to 8.4 so that is easy, but is the reindex required or just suggested for features? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: