Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201106091730.p59HUfB08649@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2011-05-11 at 14:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com> writes: > > > I've been starting to work on a 'what's new in 9.1' like i did last > > > year, and am faced with what I feel is a bug, while building a demo case > > > for collation. > > > > > Here it is: > > > > > SELECT * from (values ('llegar'),('llorer'),('lugar')) as tmp > > > order by 1 collate "es_ES.utf8"; > > > ERROR: collations are not supported by type integer at character 74 > > > > This isn't a bug, or at least not one we're going to fix. ORDER BY > > column-number is a legacy syntax that doesn't support many options, and > > COLLATE is one of the ones that it doesn't support. Column numbers in ORDER BY is ANSI syntax so I don't think calling them "legacy" is accurate. "limited functionality"? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: