Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mi? jun 01 18:22:56 -0400 2011:
> >>> ISTM that it would be useful to run postgres in a mode where it
> >>> doesn't actually try to start up the database, but parses
> >>> postgresql.conf and then exits, perhaps printing out the value of a
> >>> certain GUC as it does so. ?In this case, data_directory.
> >
> >> I had the same thought, and wondered if we could use the feature
> >> elsewhere.
> >
> > This was suggested quite some time ago, IIRC, but we never got round to it.
> >
> > The main problem in the current context is that it only fixes the issue
> > so long as you ignore the possibility that relevant values were
> > specified on the command line or via environment variables, rather than
> > coming directly from the config file. ?PGDATA is thus a particular
> > hazard here: all you need is to be running with a different PGDATA
> > setting in your environment than was used when "pg_ctl start" was
> > issued, and you're hosed.
> 
> I guess I'm missing something here.  If you change PGDATA, you're
> going to be working on a different cluster, but that's what you asked
> for.  I guess there could be a problem if you used pg_ctl -D dir
> start, and postgres --tell-me-the-data-dir relied on PGDATA in telling
> you what the data directory should be, but that seems simple to work
> around: just have -D dir set $PGDATA before invoking postgres.

Is this just part of our existing TODOs?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +