Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110527183143.GB17056@shinkuro.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ? (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inspecting a DB - psql or system tables ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > While parsing the output of psql is cumbersome, accessing the > > system tables seems more likely to break whenever a new version > > of PostgreSQL comes out. > > Really? Those catalogs are pretty stable, and when changed they're > usually extended (new columns are added). So well written queries won't > break very often. Actually I'd expect the psql output to change much > more often. The whole point of the information_schema is that it's well-defined by the standard. The system tables themselves do sometimes change between versions -- that's why you get warnings from psql when you start up a client with a different major version number than the server. (If you want to see this in action, try using a 7.4-era client with 9.0, and do some tab completion or something like that.) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: