Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105231857.p4NIvRh13495@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Sorry, I was unclear. ?The question is whether the case of _name_ of the > > locale is significant, meaning can you have two locale names that differ > > only by case and behave differently? > > That would seem surprising to me, but I really have no idea. > > There's the other direction, too: two locales that vary by something > more than case, but still have identical behavior. Maybe we just > decide not to worry about that, but then why worry about this? Well, if we remove the check then people could easily get broken upgrades by upgrading to a server with a different locale. A Google search seems to indicate the locale names are case-sensitive so I am thinking the problem is that the user didn't have exact locales, and needs that to use pg_upgrade. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: