Re: Use of access(X_OK) check in pg_upgrade
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use of access(X_OK) check in pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105181616.p4IGGIU20073@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use of access(X_OK) check in pg_upgrade (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Use of access(X_OK) check in pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:41, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > I broke the Win32 build members by using access(X_OK) in pg_upgrade. ?I > > have a fix for this but looking at pg_upgrade's exec.c, I see for > > Win32: > > > > ? ? ? ? ? ?if ((buf.st_mode & S_IXUSR) == 0) > > > > I am confused why Windows supports S_IXUSR but not X_OK. > > It doesn't natively - we define it in port/win32.h Sure, but that is defined as _S_IEXEC: #define S_IXUSR _S_IEXEC #define S_IRWXU (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR) So what is _S_IEXEC. Anyway, execute permission means something different on Win32 for directories so I have a fix applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: