Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105132052.p4DKqUV19009@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> However, it would in a lot of cases be very useful to have osmething > >> like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE <blah>. Which would only accept > >> temporary (and maybe unlogged) tables. And then would auto-create the > >> PG_<version>_<catversion> directory upon startup. > >> > >> That's obviously a 9.2 feature though, it's not an adjustment of an > >> existing one, it's brand new :-) > > > > Yes, that's a nice feature for 9.2 > > +1. That's a really nice idea. Added to TODO: Allow tablespaces on RAM-based partitions for unlogged tables * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2011-05/msg00033.php -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: