Re: "stored procedures"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "stored procedures" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105091841.p49IfTb24085@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "stored procedures" (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "stored procedures"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Peter, > > > I would like to collect some specs on this feature. So does anyone have > > links to documentation of existing implementations, or their own spec > > writeup? A lot of people appear to have a very clear idea of this > > concept in their own head, so let's start collecting those. > > Delta between SPs and Functions for PostgreSQL: > > * SPs are executed using CALL or EXECUTE, and not SELECT. > > * SPs do not return a value > ** optional: SPs *may* have OUT parameters. [ Late reply.] What is it about stored procedures that would require it not to return a value or use CALL? I am trying to understand what part of this is "procedures" (doesn't return a values, we decided there isn't much value for that syntax vs. functions), and anonymous transactions. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: