Re: pg_upgrade's bindir options could be optional
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade's bindir options could be optional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105080020.p480KNY12424@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade's bindir options could be optional (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On l?r, 2011-05-07 at 13:33 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Another > > interesting approach would be to assume the /bin directory is ../bin > > from the data directory. That would work for some installs, > > particularly for people moving things around, but again, it is worth > > trying to default something that isn't going to be 100% right? > > In practice, there are the two main camps of parallel installation and > move old installation out of the way. They are probably both pretty big > (Debias camp 1, Red Hat is camp 2, for a start). So it would be worth > doing something to help one camp or the other. > > On that other hand, we don't have any data on how many people have the > bindir at ../bin from the data directory, or whether it would be the old > or the new bindir. Yes, it was too complex which is why I made it explicit. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: