Re: undead index
От | Jens Wilke |
---|---|
Тема | Re: undead index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201105061701.06448.jens.wilke@affinitas.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: undead index (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: undead index
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 17:32:50 Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm, is this an autogenerated index? I don't think so. And to confirm, that i really deleted the new cluster between the pg_upgrade run and the dump|restore i did it again and was able to revive this index again: foo=# \d+ foo.bar_idx Index "foo.bar_idx" Column | Type | Definition | Storage | Description ----------+-----------------------+------------+----------+------------- ulq_guid | character varying(24) | ulq_guid | extended | btree, for table "foo.foo" But it's again not in the pg_dumpall output, using the same binary like for the dump|restore. Regards, Jens
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: