On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:49:30 am Dave Page wrote:
>
> Putting aside the fact that Damien pointed out that the PGXN website
> is out of date (and therefore so is my information on the lack of a
> cli), no, those are not the same. The code for both projects is there
> in 9.1 and can be used for production applications. Those two features
> are in no way vapourware, nor are they a WIP, at least as far as the
> feature set for this release is concerned.
The same applies to PGXN, the framework is there and people are using it, I fail
to see the distinction.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com