Re: Typed table DDL loose ends

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:44:53PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:57 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > * Users can CREATE TABLE OF on a type they don't own
> > This in turns blocks the owner's ability to alter the table/type.  However, we
> > already have this hazard with composite-type columns.  A TODO to address this
> > broadly seems in order, but it's not a 9.1 issue.
> 
> I think we should change that to mirror the inheritance policy: you have
> to be the owner of the "parent".  Note that this is newly relevant in
> 9.1, because you couldn't change composite types before.

Would we add that restriction to use of "CREATE TABLE t (c comptype)" as well,
or just to "CREATE TABLE t OF comptype"?