Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade bug found! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110409030148.GK4548@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade bug found! (bricklen <bricklen@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade bug found!
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
bricklen, * bricklen (bricklen@gmail.com) wrote: > Now, is this safe to run against my production database? Yes, with a few caveats. One recommendation is to also increase autovacuum_freeze_max_age to 500000000 (500m), which will hopefully prevent autovacuum from 'butting in' and causing issues during the process. Also, a database-wide 'VACUUM FREEZE;' should be lower-risk, if you can afford it (it will cause a lot of i/o on the system). The per-table 'VACUUM FREEZE <table>;' that the script does can end up removing clog files prematurely. > Anyone have any suggestions or changes before I commit myself to this > course of action? If you run into problems, and perhaps even before starting, you may want to pop in to #postgresql on irc.freenode.net, there are people there who can help you with this process who are very familiar with PG. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: