Re: Background fsck
| От | Achilleas Mantzios |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Background fsck |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201104080919.43152.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Background fsck (Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Background fsck
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Στις Friday 08 April 2011 08:55:51 ο/η Ireneusz Pluta έγραψε: > Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > > > > In anyway, having FreeBSD to fsck, (background or not) should not happen. And the problem > > becomes bigger when cheap SATA drives will cheat about their write cache being flushed to the disk. > > So in the common case with cheap hardware, it is wise to have a UPS connected and being monitored > > by the system. > > > > It's not lack of UPS. Power issues are taken care of here. It's a buggy 3ware controller which hangs > the machine ocassionally and the only way to have it come back is to power cycle, hard reset is not > enough. What has happened to me (as Greg mentioned) is that repeatedly interrupted background fscks (having the system crash while background fsck was executing) might result in a seriously damaged fs. Add to this, the possible overhead by rebuilding software raid (gmirror) at the same time, and the situation becomes more complicated. So its better to replace/fix/remove this buggy controller, before anything else. > > -- Achilleas Mantzios
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: