Re: SSI bug?
От | Dan Ports |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110403061644.GS81592@csail.mit.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSI bug? ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI bug?
Re: SSI bug? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I think I see what is going on now. We are sometimes failing to set the commitSeqNo correctly on the lock. In particular, if a lock assigned to OldCommittedSxact is marked with InvalidSerCommitNo, it will never be cleared. The attached patch corrects this: TransferPredicateLocksToNewTarget should initialize a new lock entry's commitSeqNo to that of the old one being transferred, or take the minimum commitSeqNo if it is merging two lock entries. Also, CreatePredicateLock should initialize commitSeqNo for to InvalidSerCommitSeqNo instead of to 0. (I don't think using 0 would actually affect anything, but we should be consistent.) I also added a couple of assertions I used to track this down: a lock's commitSeqNo should never be zero, and it should be InvalidSerCommitSeqNo if and only if the lock is not held by OldCommittedSxact. Takashi, does this patch fix your problem with leaked SIReadLocks? Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: