Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110401130550.GU26726@aart.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Index fillfactor changed in pg9? (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index fillfactor changed in pg9?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Glyn Astill wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Just testing some new hardware on 9.0.3 and have restored one of our dumps from 8.4.7. What I'm seeing is although tablesizes are the same, indexes are a lot bigger, approx 50%. > > I've done a search and so far can't find anything, but have default fillfactors changed? Or is it something else? > > Thanks > Glyn > Given absolutely zero information, are both platforms the same number of bits? 32-versus 64-bit? The alignment needs for 64-bit could result in needing more space. Another alternative is that the order of data insertion caused a bigger index. What happens if you run a REINDEX on both DB's to the index sizes? Regards, Ken
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: