Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
От | Adrian von Bidder |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201104010916.18566@fortytwo.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heyho! On Friday 01 April 2011 02.39:25 Christopher Browne wrote: > An advantage to this uri form is that it allows applications to be > configured uniformly - I do not need to ask "is this using libpq, needing > one sort of configuration, or Java, needing another?" > > Rather, I may say, "here is a uri I may use with any of my applications" Since URI stings are popular, it might really make sense if pg could recommend a preferred form of postgres URI strings (and obviously implement it in libpq). For the non-libpq APIs (there's at least http://python.projects.postgresql.org/, don't know about others), it would still be just a recommendation that they could follow or not follow, so the situation wouldn't change too much from today, I fear. cheers -- vbi -- East Indians sometimes see Heaven as a giant bureaucracy, and frequently report being sent back because of clerical errors. <http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2007/01/culture_and_neardeath_experien.php>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: