Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110217154203.GX4116@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote: > I just posted on this. The risk is to people using the packages --- the > packages themselves include the source as an option, so they are fine, > but everyone using those packages would also be required to distribute > source, which is a restriction we have avoided in the past. I think you may want to reread the GPL on this. They're not actually required to distribute source *with* the binaries (hell, Debian doesn't..) as long as they are willing to produce it if asked. And that's the source for the binaries which actually depend on the GPL'd code, eg, the community-built psql binary that you're talking about here.. They don't have to provide source for everything on the CD or something (again, Debian has a "non-free" section also..). Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: