Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201102170312.p1H3CDQ06535@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:53 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient > > > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance. > > > > I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would, > > and certainly don't agree with it. > > Yeah I am not sure I can buy Tom's argument here. The GPL is fairly > clear and is compatible with the BSD/Postgres license. Compatible if you want the result to be GPL, yes. I hardly see that as desirable. I am unclear what is being said above. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: