Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20110217015336.GK4116@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance. I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would, and certainly don't agree with it. > Whereas, if we get rid of readline, it no longer matters whether we > depend on OpenSSL. I agree w/ the other responses to this, in particular from Stark, but I just wanted to point out that we're much more likely to come across other GPL-licensed things that we want to support linking against (and who might link against us..) than OpenSSL-type-licensed things.. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: