Re: [HACKERS] btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201102082242.p18MgCe11171@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote: > > Aha, > > > > Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru > > > > After a month I didn't see any activity on this patch, so I I added it to > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=350 Jan 21 > > > > Now, I realised it was too late. Added to current commitfest. > > I think this patch missed the deadline for the current CommitFest. > It's true that it was posted to the list in time, but it's just > madness to think we can do review in a meaningful way and get done in > a reasonable time if every patch that's ever been posted is fair game > to be added to the CommitFest at any point. I believe it's a > generally accepted principle that adding things to the CommitFest > properly is the submitter's responsibility. > > That having been said, this looks like a fairly mechanical change to a > contrib module that you and Teodor wrote. So I'd say if you guys are > confident that it's correct, go ahead and commit. If you need it > reviewed, or if you can't commit it in the next week or so, I think > it's going to have to wait for 9.2. If you need a +1, agreed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: