Re: Varlena and binary
От | Radosław Smogura |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Varlena and binary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201102072257.39152.rsmogura@softperience.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Varlena and binary (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Just from curious may I ask in which direction this will go, and how this will affect performance of text and binary format? Actually I started to make smaller improvements, and I think about one big to encode text (when client and server encoding are different) directly to StringInfo, without intermediate buffer. Thanks in advice Radek Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Monday 07 February 2011 17:12:07 > Radosław Smogura <mail@smogura.eu> writes: > > I'm sending small patch for textsend. It reduces unnecessary copies, and > > memory usage for duplication of varlena data. May you look? > > This code will break the day that text and bytea don't have the same > internal representation, which seems likely to be soon. Barring some > compelling evidence of a major performance improvement obtainable this > way, I don't think we want this patch. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: