Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: remove tags.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: remove tags. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201102071554.p17Fswe20719@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: remove tags. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Why Produce PDF files?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> >>> remove tags. > >> > > >> >> Sorry, vague commit message (I forgot squash). > >> > > >> >> Can I will use git ammend to improve this message? > >> > >> Absolutely not. > >> > >> > How about git revert, instead? ?It's not apparent to me that these > >> > changes were improvements. > >> > >> I'll buy that one. > > > > [ ?CC to docs, committers removed. ] > > > > Well, if we want to revert, then we have to add <literal> to all the > > numbers used in our docs --- there was no logic in what we previously > > had. ?Do we want that? > > > > Here is an example line I did not change: > > > > ? an otherwise idle connection. ?A value of 0 uses the system default. > > > > Do we want that 0 to appear in a fixed-width font via <literal>? > > It is easy to do but we should decide. > > [ removing -hackers from CC also, no need to cross-post ] > > Hmm. I'm starting to lean toward leaving this as you have it. > > Which way did we more commonly do it before you applied this patch? It was mostly like the line I have above, meaning it was not in fixed-width font, 95% I would say. I modified 19 to be like the rest. I left <literal> where the context made sense. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: