Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?
От | Alan Hodgson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201101271611.18465@hal.medialogik.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives? (Robert Schnabel <schnabelr@missouri.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?
Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On January 27, 2011, Robert Schnabel <schnabelr@missouri.edu> wrote:
> So my questions are 1) am I'm crazy for doing this, 2) would you change
> anything and 3) is it acceptable to put the xlog & wal (and perhaps tmp
> filespace) on a different controller than everything else? Please keep
> in mind I'm a geneticist who happens to know a little bit about
> bioinformatics and not the reverse. :-)
>
Putting the WAL on a second controller does help, if you're write-heavy.
I tried separating indexes and data once on one server and didn't really notice that it helped much. Managing the space was problematic. I would suggest putting those together on a single RAID-10 of all the 300GB drives (minus a spare). It will probably outperform separate arrays most of the time, and be much easier to manage.
--
A hybrid Escalade is missing the point much in the same way that having a diet soda with your extra large pepperoni pizza is missing the point.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: