Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201101060313.p063Dxh22995@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > I think pg_dumpall would have failed with this setup too, so I don't see > > this as a pg_upgrade bug, nor something that I am willing to risk adding > > to pg_upgrade. > > If adding RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION fixes the bug, I think we should > consider doing that. If we add every fix that could conceivably break a pg_dumpall restore, pg_upgrade will be less stable than it is now. I don't see why adding this should be any different. If you want to argue that pg_dumpall should be doing it, that is a separate issue and not related to pg_upgrade. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: