Re: pg_upgrade patches applied
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade patches applied |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201101051539.p05Fd8m24009@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade patches applied (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade patches applied
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > The last patch fixes a problem where I was not migrating > > pg_largeobject_metadata and its index for 9.0+ migrations, which of > > course would only affect migrations to 9.1 and 9.0 to 9.0 migrations, so > > I backpatched that to 9.0. > > That isn't going to work. At least not unless you start trying to force > roles to have the same OIDs in the new installation. Uh, don't we store the pg_shadow.usesysid in pg_largeobject_metadata? If so I can use the CREATE ROLE ... SYSID clause when doing a binary upgrade. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: