Re: pg_ctl and port number detection

Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Applied.
>
> storage.sgml seems to need to be updated.

Ah, I see that now, thanks.  Patch attached and applied.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml
index 260df3d..cda7f64 100644
*** /tmp/jT4w0b_storage.sgml    Mon Dec 27 15:19:18 2010
--- doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml    Mon Dec 27 15:18:51 2010
*************** last started with</entry>
*** 116,123 ****

  <row>
   <entry><filename>postmaster.pid</></entry>
!  <entry>A lock file recording the current server PID and shared memory
! segment ID (not present after server shutdown)</entry>
  </row>

  </tbody>
--- 116,124 ----

  <row>
   <entry><filename>postmaster.pid</></entry>
!  <entry>A lock file recording the current postmaster process id (PID),
!  cluster data directory, port number, Unix domain socket directory,
!  and shared memory segment ID</entry>
  </row>

  </tbody>