Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:33:00PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 12/27/2010 11:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >After a bit of experimentation, I can say that this is better than
> >Andrew's hack, but it's still a good distance shy of something that
> >should be automated or treated as a hard requirement.
> 
> I'm always happy if someone produces something better than I did :-)
> 
> On a more general point, it would be useful to have some
> infrastructure for running quality checks like this and publishing
> the results. We should be way beyond the point where we rely on
> individuals doing this sort of stuff.

This sounds like an excellent early candidate for the bitrot farm.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate