Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201012230202.oBN22Ze21097@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with
custom unix_socket_directory
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Quan Zongliang's message of mar dic 21 18:36:11 -0300 2010: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:29:17 -0300 > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think the way this should work is that you call postmaster with a new > > > switch and it prints out its configuration, after reading the > > > appropriate config file(s). That way it handles all the little details > > > such as figuring out the correct config file, hadle include files, etc. > > > This output would be presumably easier to parse and more trustworthy. > > > > Sorry for my late reply. > > > > I will check the source of postmaster. > > Actually Bruce Momjian is now working on a different fix: > unix_socket_directory would be added to postmaster.pid, allowing pg_ctl > to find it. Yes, I will apply this patch tomorrow and it will be in 9.1. Thanks for the report. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: