Re: BUG #5781: unaccent() function should be marked IMMUTABLE
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5781: unaccent() function should be marked IMMUTABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201012230145.oBN1jfT16777@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5781: unaccent() function should be marked IMMUTABLE (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5781: unaccent() function should be marked IMMUTABLE
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Grant Hutchins and Peter Jaros" <grant@pivotallabs.com> writes: > > The unaccent(text) function supplied by contrib/unaccent is marked VOLATILE. > > This prevents it from being used in indexes. We believe that the function > > meets the requirements to be marked IMMUTABLE. > > No, it most certainly doesn't. It depends on the behavior of a > dictionary that it has no hard-wired connection to, so the specific > behavior of the dictionary is uncertain. Even if you're willing to > assume that the dictionary being used is the one defined by this > module, that dictionary depends on external configuration files > which are easily changeable. > > Arguably it'd be reasonable to change the function's marking from > volatile to stable, but that's not going to be enough to allow use in > indexes. So, should we change unaccent() from VOLATILE to STABLE? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: