Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory
От | Quan Zongliang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20101222063611.b8698787.quanzongliang@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:29:17 -0300 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Quan Zongliang's message of sáb nov 27 06:03:12 -0300 2010: > > Hi, all > > > > I created a pg_ctl patch to fix: > > * BUG #5103: "pg_ctl -w (re)start" fails with custom unix_socket_directory > > Allow pg_ctl to work properly with configuration files located outside the PGDATA directory > > I think the way this should work is that you call postmaster with a new > switch and it prints out its configuration, after reading the > appropriate config file(s). That way it handles all the little details > such as figuring out the correct config file, hadle include files, etc. > This output would be presumably easier to parse and more trustworthy. > > Right now we have --describe-config, which is missing the values for > each config option. > Sorry for my late reply. I will check the source of postmaster. -- Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang@gmail.com>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: