Re: CPU bound
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CPU bound |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20101220154847.GX10252@aart.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CPU bound (James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CPU bound
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:33:26AM -0500, James Cloos wrote: > >>>>> "MG" == Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com> writes: > > MG> Good time accounting is the most compelling reason for having a wait > MG> event interface, like Oracle. Without the wait event interface, one > MG> cannot really tell where the time is spent, at least not without > MG> profiling the database code, which is not an option for a production > MG> database. > > And how exactly, given that the kernel does not know whether the CPU is > active or waiting on ram, could an application do so? > Exactly. I have only seen this data from hardware emulators. It would be nice to have... :) Ken
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: