Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201012030026.oB30QZ927456@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> On tis, 2010-11-30 at 14:20 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> > I agree, that argument is completely misconceived. If the DBA is > >> > paying enough attention to use LIMIT, s/he should be paying enough > >> > attention not to do damage in the first place. If that were the only > >> > argument in its favor I'd be completely against the feature. > >> > >> I don't have any use for DELETE with LIMIT, but UPDATE with LIMIT could > >> be very useful if you are doing full-table updates and you don't have > >> enough space so you do it in chunks. > > > > So should this now be a TODO item? ?Text? > > Allow DELETE and UPDATE to be used with LIMIT and ORDER BY. Done: Allow DELETE and UPDATE to be used with LIMIT and ORDER BY * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01997.php * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg00021.php -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: