Re: [pgsql-www] Forums at postgresql.com.au
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Forums at postgresql.com.au |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201011201559.oAKFxro09509@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Forums at postgresql.com.au (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance <elliotchance@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> forums@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email disappears but the mailing list gets another copy.When the mailing list gets its copy it sends a copy to the forum (because the forum is just like a subscribed user),the parser then dissects the headers to find out where the post belongs. We already know this part works. > >> > >> So how does one respond to the user? > > > > I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing list and that mailing list sends a copy to theoriginal person thats how a mailing list works. It also sends a copy to the forum which is parses you and that personand anyone else can see the reply on the forum. > > Clearly you're not understanding my point. I don't *want* it to go to > the list. I want to write a private email to the user who made a post > from the forum, without having to set up and use a forum account. Just > a simple response, just the way I can do now. > > But I'll leave it to somebody else to attempt to explain that, since I > clearly am unable to get it across. I would argue that if the person wants to use a forum, aren't they saying they don't want to be contacted via email. I think we just throw it only to the forum (that is the user) and leave it that. Forum users don't get the _rich_ email experience. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: