Re: unlogged tables

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:48:52PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 03:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >I don't particularly care for the name UNSYNCED, and I'm starting
> >not to like UNLOGGED much either, although at least that one is an
> >actual word.  PERMANENT and the flavors of TEMPORARY are a
> >reasonably comprehensible as a description of user-visible
> >behavior, but UNLOGGED and UNSYNCED sounds a lot like they're
> >discussing internal details that the user might not actually
> >understand or care about.  I don't have a better idea right off the
> >top of my head, though.
> 
> Maybe VOLATILE for UNSYNCED? Not sure about UNLOGGED.

+1 for describing the end-user-visible behavior.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate