Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2010 01:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>>>   In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite
> >>>>   efficiently.  What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word",
> >>>>   with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the
> >>>>   null word.  So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of
> >>>>   however many such rows there are.
> >> So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for
> >> fixing GIN?
> > Is this a TODO?
> 
> Yes.

OK, can you add it or give me wording, or it is already on the TODO
list?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +