Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes

Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>  In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite
> >>  efficiently.  What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word",
> >>  with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the
> >>  null word.  So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of
> >>  however many such rows there are.
> 
> So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for 
> fixing GIN?

Is this a TODO?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +