Re: Disk Performance Problem on Large DB
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disk Performance Problem on Large DB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20101104210250.GL27429@aart.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Disk Performance Problem on Large DB ("Jonathan Hoover" <jhoover@yahoo-inc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Disk Performance Problem on Large DB
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:42:49PM -0700, Jonathan Hoover wrote: > Hello, > > I have a RHEL 5 box, 4 GB RAM, single hard drive SATA, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4. A basic workstation. > > I have a simple database, with one table for now. It has 4 columns: > > anid serial primary key unique, > time timestamp, > source varchar(5), > unitid varchar(15), > guid varchar(32) > > There is a btree index on each. > > I am loading data 1,000,000 (1M) rows at a time using psql and a COPY command. Once I hit 2M rows, my performance justdrops out, and the next 1M never finishes. It takes 7 minutes for 1M rows to load. Once 2M are in there, I've waitedan hour, and nothing. It doesn't seem to matter which 1M rows I try to load next, none ever finish. Each 1M rows isabout 70MB on disk in the raw input file. > > I have "atop" installed, and it reports the drives at 100%, which it reports for the first 1M rows too. The MBw/s goesfrom 20+ on the first 2M rows, down to about 4 MBw/s or less now. The processor usage is at about 2 to 8% at this time(used by postgres). > > I have even waited for 1M rows to load, then done a vacuum for no good reason, then even restarted postgresql. I've madesure no disk or proc activity is happening before I start the next 1M rows. None of that seems to matter. > > I have a total of about 70M rows to load, but am at a standstill. I've read up on whatever performance docs I can findonline, but I am not getting anywhere. > > I've increased shared_buffers to 256MB, and I've tried it with fsync commented out as per the default config. I've alsotried it with fsync=off. No difference. > > Ideas? Thanks in advance, > Jon The initial 1M load if the table has just been truncated or created has no WAL logging. You can boost maintenance_work_mem to increase index creation/update performance. You are severely I/O limited and would be better off dropping your indexes during the load and re- creating them afterwards. If you are starting with an empty table, truncate it and then load all the data in a single transaction, all 7 COPY commands. Then COMMIT and build the indexes. Your question is also missing key information like config details, PostgreSQL version, ... Cheers, Ken
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: