Re: Git conversion status
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Git conversion status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201009222347.o8MNlCj02992@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Git conversion status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> As far as I can see, I need to go to the master clone, run a checkout > >> and pull on each branch, and *then* a pull on the local clone updates to > >> the latest head on that branch. �It is not enough to pull when the > >> master branch is checked out. > > > Ah, crap. You're right. Sucktastic. > > As far as I can tell so far, the multiple-workdir setup dominates all > the others in terms of minimizing the amount of "git pull" monkeywork. Yes, that is what I am using too. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: