Re: repository size differences
От | Abhijit Menon-Sen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: repository size differences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20100922023257.GA15743@toroid.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: repository size differences (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: repository size differences
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 2010-09-21 17:53:22 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: > > > Does anyone know offhand why the sizes are so different? > > Magnus did > git gc --aggressive --prune > during the conversion. I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it. That's not it. I ran the same git gc command on my old repository, and it didn't make any difference to the size. (I didn't try with a larger window size, though.) Oh well, it's probably just some problem with the older conversion, and doesn't matter now. The number of commits ("git rev-list --all|wc -l") is broadly similar (36848 old, 35978 new), as is the number of packed objects (~383k old, ~387k new). I'm certainly not complaining about git clone being twice as fast. :-) -- ams
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: