Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions
От | Joshua J. Kugler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201009211528.07761.joshua@eeinternet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions (Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Dmitriy Igrishin elucidated thus: > Hey all, > > After ten years with stored procedures I am thinking so this is not > > > too well technique. Much better is writing stored procedures to a > > file and using usual tools for file's versioning. We did some tools > > for storing a versions inside database, but still we prefer a > > standard developer tools - vi or emacs like editor and plain text. > > The main problem of procedures maintained inside database is loss > > of outer formatting and outer comments. And you cannot to group > > procedures to modules. On the other hand - some history can be > > useful for all database objects - not only for stored procedures. > > Agree with Pavel. At the danger of sounding like a "me too:" Agree with Pavel. Keep version control in version control. Make creation/replacement of stored procedures part of your deployment system. j -- Joshua Kugler Part-Time System Admin/Programmer http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: